i.want.world

banking.economics.sustainability and other shiny stuff

  • The quotable Scott Adams

    • 1 Jun 2010
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • climate diplomacy scott adams technology
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    You know him as the cartoonist behind Dilbert, but my goodness, the guy can write. Here are a few quotes from some of his recent blog posts, filled with ideas that bring the reader closer to understanding the world than many an academic study.

    On BP stocks

    This is also a test of my theory that you should buy stocks in the companies that you hate the most. In general, you hate the companies that have the most power. And BP is the frickin' Death Star of companies. They're in the process of destroying an entire region of the world and there's still no talk of cutting their next dividend. I admire them in the same way I admire the work ethic of serial killers. There's an undeniable awesomeness about BP. I hate BP, but I still want to have their baby.

    On climate change:

    Humans are obsessed with their weight. I think a big part of that obsession is the simple fact that weight is easy to measure. Scales are relatively cheap, accurate enough, and sitting right on the floor next to your shower when you need them...Generally speaking, we care most about the things we can easily measure, even if we know other things are more important. The measurement bias is one of the problems with selling a concept like global warming to the masses. Individuals can't measure global warming, and it doesn't change much from day to day.

    On counter-terrorism:

    Terror networks are perfect targets for false communications. First, the real orders sound exactly like pranks. It would be hard to sort out the evil mastermind plots from the CIA practical jokes. For example, if you get the order to shove C4 up your ass and yell WALAWALAWALA while running toward a heavily armed American Checkpoint, is that a real one or a prank? It's hard to tell.

    On the language of diplomacy:

    I suppose it's the Dilbert cartoonist in me, but I can't help seeing world affairs as essentially a bunch of middle managers sitting around a rectangular table coming up with clever ways to convince the masses that turds are diamonds.

    On complexity:

    The real problem is that the world has become so complex that simple tasks are nearly impossible...I'd like to have an iPod. It would be great for working out. But I know that heading down that road would be disaster and heartache. Sure, it would be a simple task if it were just me. But the kids have iPods, and share an account, and there are gift cards, and limitations on porting to different devices, and a computer that only works half the time, and lord knows what other problems are lurking. The one thing I know for sure is that I'm not going to plug an iPod into the computer and happily download music with a few keystrokes. It would be more complicated than the Normandy Invasion. Instead, I just live without music. And exercise. So I suppose complexity is actually killing me now.

    • Tweet
  • The thrilling potential of SixthSense technology

    • 17 Nov 2009
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • future interface internet sixth sence technology ted
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost
    http://www.ted.com/talks/pranav_mistry_the_thrilling_potential_of_sixthsense_technology.html
    • Tweet
  • Mavizen's 130 MPH TTX02 Electric Bike Runs Linux

    • 9 Nov 2009
    • 1 Response
    •  views
    • bike green sustainability technology
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost


    mavizen electric motorcycle photo

     

    Why did you stop? Well, I was recompiling my kernel and got a segfault... Mavizen has decided to offer a new electric bike based on the previous winner of the TTXGP so that other teams can have a solid foundation to build on for next year. The TTX02 is based on the KTM RC8 with a Agni powerplant.

    via TreeHugger on 11/7/09
    • Tweet
  • why technology hasn't saved us from inflation (but still can)

    • 19 Aug 2008
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • crisis economics markets technology
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    I have a piece in the Aug 11th issue of Newsweek International, but Newsweek's website does such a poor job with magazine content that it's practically unfindable (it's actually on the seventh screen of this series of perspectives from economists and other experts). So here it is:

    Unleash The World's Engineers
    Chris Anderson believes that the price-cutting power of technology can still bring nations relief if only bureaucrats will allow it to.

    Technology can be a powerful deflationary force. Thanks to Moore's Law (the remarkable ability of computer technology to double in power for the same price, or halve in price for the same power, every 18 months) if you want a 50 percent discount on an electronic gadget, just wait 18 months. Or turn a service into software, and it's just a matter of time before it is free.

    But technology has been unable to offset some of the crucial supply issues around energy and food, both of which are at the core of today's inflationary quandary. Nuclear power was supposed to bring electricity too cheap to meter, but our electricity bills have never been higher. The green revolution was supposed to bring an endlessly bountiful harvest, making hunger a thing of the past, but we now have rice shortages and corn nearly tripled in price over the past year. And for all of our virtual connection via cell phones, video-conferencing and e-mail, we've increased our driving and flying to such an extent that we've outstripped global oil-production capacity, driving energy prices to all-time highs.

    What happened? Were we wrong to think that technology would deliver us from rising prices? Well, yes, but it's not technology's fault. We mostly have ourselves to blame for standing in its way.

    Why are agricultural yields not keeping up with population growth? In large part because the European Union essentially banned genetically modified crops both on its own soil and in imports, thus exporting its technology-blocking regulations to trade partners in Africa and elsewhere.

    Another reason food is so expensive is that fertilizer prices are also near all-time highs. That's because the feedstock for much fertilizer is natural gas, and we don't have enough of that, either. Not because we can't get it out of the ground using high-tech tools, but because we can't get it where it's needed. Of the last 53 applications to build liquefied natural gas (LNG) ports and processing facilities in the United States, 50 were denied because of objections from the communities near where they would be located. Meanwhile we haven't built a natural-gas pipeline from Alaska in part because of similar environmental concerns.

    The shortage of natural-gas-transportation infrastructure is also in part responsible for our high electricity prices, as is the multidecade virtual moratorium on new nuclear power plants after Three Mile Island. Meanwhile, policies putting high import tariffs on foreign ethanol (to protect American corn farmers) have raised the price of gas, while a refusal to follow California's lead on car efficiency standards has allowed national gas demand to grow faster than supply.

    All this said, I believe today's inflation will ultimately speed the adoption of technologies that can fight it. The higher prices get in the atoms economy, where things get more expensive every year, the more incentive there is to move goods and services to the bits economy, where things get cheaper. How high will airfares have to get (think they're high now? Just wait for new carbon taxes to kick in) before you invest in good videoconference gear and skip the flight altogether? How high will gas prices get before you decide to work a few more days a week from your fully wired home office, or skip the mall and shop online from home? The best way to lower energy prices is to cut demand.

    In a world where seemingly everything is getting more expensive, the price of digital technology continues to fall and the differences between those two economies are growing. If getting rich was the incentive to go digital a decade ago, saving money may be an even stronger motivation this time. 

     

    via The Long Tail by Chris Anderson on 8/17/08

    • Tweet
  • when everything connects

    • 6 Aug 2008
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • technology web 2.0
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost
    The thing about the The Next Great Thing is that no one can predict it.

    20070428issuecovus400

    • Tweet
  • About

    Founder of
    Diplomatic Goods

    LinkedIn

    94878 Views
  • Archive

    • 2012 (35)
      • May (6)
      • April (4)
      • March (6)
      • February (8)
      • January (11)
    • 2011 (76)
      • December (9)
      • November (4)
      • October (10)
      • September (1)
      • August (2)
      • July (1)
      • June (8)
      • May (5)
      • April (6)
      • March (9)
      • February (7)
      • January (14)
    • 2010 (61)
      • December (6)
      • November (7)
      • October (6)
      • September (7)
      • August (2)
      • July (4)
      • June (6)
      • May (6)
      • April (3)
      • March (5)
      • February (5)
      • January (4)
    • 2009 (53)
      • December (5)
      • November (4)
      • October (7)
      • September (4)
      • August (4)
      • July (4)
      • June (3)
      • May (7)
      • April (5)
      • March (3)
      • February (4)
      • January (3)
    • 2008 (78)
      • December (5)
      • November (4)
      • October (6)
      • September (11)
      • August (17)
      • July (35)

    Get Updates

    Subscribe via RSS
    TwitterFacebookFlickr